Drummond ignores separate school funding costs

By: Robert C. Henry 

Don Drummond presented a massive list of cost saving measures to Premier Dalton McGuinty’s Liberal government while stepping around a political minefield.

Drummond ignored an obvious savings when he failed to recommend the amalgamation of Ontario’s public and separate schools. This omission not only diminished the overall credibility of his entire report but also left the distinct impression that in Ontario politics trumps pragmatic reasoning. 

Ontario’s Liberal government is facing a $16 billion annual deficit. In past years it has been forcefully argued by some that elimination of public funding for separate schools could save taxpayers $1 billion a year – a difficult number for any objective economist to disregard. 

Whether it’s a savings of $1 billion or half that amount it’s a figure too big to be ignored and the only logical reason why it received no attention from Drummond has to be political. There is no other explanation. McGuinty simply does not want to alienate Ontario’s Catholics. 

In Muskoka we’re certainly not immune to the insanity of the current system. On any given school day one can watch the procession of school buses with different destinations – many of which are half empty – travelling the same route a minimum of twice a day. 

And that’s just part of the expensive story. There are obvious duplication costs in administration, support personnel, excess capacity and capital costs. 

And all of this wasteful duplication falls on the taxpayer’s shoulders. Logic doesn’t enter the picture. Why pay once for a school system when twice makes infinitely less sense? 

It’s bad enough that Muskoka’s taxpayer’s are burdened with the inherent duplication associated with a seven-silo municipal system of governance. Local residents get the double-whammy – two school systems and paying twice for many municipal services. The overlap in both is little more than financial lunacy. 

Former premier Bill Davis initiated public funding for separate schools in Ontario. That 1985 decision will probably remain as his most noteworthy legacy. It left Ontario’s taxpayers to foot the bill ever since. 

In fairness it’s the McGuinty Liberals that have consistently refused to allow a study of these duplication costs. The obvious reason: The outrage from a select group of voters  the finding of such a study would create. 

Drummond and the Premier must truly believe Ontario’s voters have IQ’s that match their shoe size. It’s insulting. The same can be said for Muskoka’s municipal mayors and District Chairman John Klinck. These local politicians all know the problem of municipal duplication, see the problem but refuse to budge from the status quo.  

Municipal and provincial leadership is a scarce commodity. 

Drummond failed to note that Ontario is the only province that publicly funds one type of religious (catholic) school to the exclusion of all others. The hypocrisy of this policy has often been angrily denounced by other religious groups, who seek the same privileged status or the elimination of the existing discriminatory system. 

The reality is that public funding of a two-school system has been widely condemned as little more than religious bigotry. 

Proponents of publicly funded separate schools still hang onto the disproven, fatuous argument that the Constitution Act of 1867, originally intended to protect minority religious rights, validates Ontario’s position. 

But the constitutional argument has fallen by the wayside. In 1997 Quebec secured a constitutional amendment to eliminate religious divisions within publicly funded schools. Further, Newfoundland and Labrador merged their school boards into one non-denominational system in 1998. 

Canada, a country with a reputation for religious tolerance, has drawn fire from even the United Nations Human Rights Committee. That committee urged Canada to “adopt steps in order to eliminate discrimination on the basis of religion in funding of schools in Ontario.” 

Ontario almost went in exactly the opposite direction in 2007. Ontario’s Progressive Conservative leader John Tory campaigned on a promise to fund all religious schools. He was widely ridiculed for his position and was subsequently defeated at the polls. 

Both the Province of Ontario and Muskoka’s 51 politicians are stumbling along dragging the unworkable, the cumbersome and the expensive into tomorrow. We all pay the price. 

That won’t change until the electorate says enough is enough.

Norm Miller’s Pervasive Political Shadows

By: Robert C. Henry 

Norm Miller, while unable to escape the shadow of three other politicos, will probably emerge victorious in a repeat performance as Parry Sound – Muskoka’s next MPP. 

One pervasive shadow that falls on Norm Miller is that of his father, Frank – the former Premier of Ontario and to some a politician extraordinaire. For Norm Miller it’s a positive shadow as for many the Miller dynasty lives on, albeit as a shadow of its former self. 

But there are some very dark shadows as well. Few can forget the reign of Conservative Premier Mike Harris at a time of corporate adulation and class warfare. During that era we were told the poor had made their own bed so they should lie in it. The 407 ETR went to the private sector along with its obvious profits and a fatal bullet found Dudley George. 

Yes, Harris led the same party that Norm Miller wants to see in power. Perhaps the high-priced image of this party has changed but the players are essentially the same, if not in body than in spirit. Conservative politics remain unchanged. 

As proof of this one only has to look at the third shadow – current Conservative Leader Tim Hudak. This is a man who wants to introduce chain gang justice and ankle bracelet control. The effectiveness and cost of his proposals has been subject to tremendous criticism from those with the credentials to know better. 

But, Tea Bagger style politics crept north long before Tim Hudak’s time and found a comfy spot with Ontario’s Tories. The Conservative’s basic philosophy continues: those who have deserved to have; those who have not deserve not to have because they put themselves where they are. 

Ironically, the quiet, competent, unassuming Norm Miller that many know just doesn’t fit well in the right-wing world of Hudak or Harris. 

It’s a bad fit: a square peg in a round hole.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Political Plan for Bracebridge Traffic Circle

By: Robert C. Henry 

The middle of the proposed new traffic circle west of the intersection of Highway 11 and Taylor Rd. is the perfect location for the political symbols that have made Muskoka famous. 

Visitors to the area are currently greeted by a pizza palace on one side of the road and a huge section of ugly, denuded rock (the centre of some very smart thinking) on the other.

This new traffic circle has infinite potential for infamy. 

Although Muskoka has an abundance of granite that pushes to the earth’s surface in a variety of swirling colours Italian marble is probably better suited for my proposed project. 

My modest suggestion is for a large, sculpted barrel in the very centre of the circle. Gracefully perched on the barrel would be a very happy pig reaching down to receive a handshake. 

Beside the barrel would be the smiling likeness of our MP Tony Clement, reaching up to clasp the pig’s outstretched hoof. Next to Clement, with his arm around his buddy’s shoulder would be none other than our smirking Prime Minister, Stephen Harper. 

The entire circle would be bordered by replicas of prisoners from Provincial jails all shackled by ball and chain. On horseback, wearing a truly southern, wide-brim hat with a shotgun over his shoulder would be our MP, Norm Miller. Next to Miller and his horse would be the stony image of Conservative leader Tim Hudak, bursting with pride and political ambition. 

To complete, and truly localize the whole scene there would be 51 headless chickens running in all directions scattered throughout this marvel of marble images. 

You would be correct in assuming this type of symbolic artwork would carry a hefty price tag. That’s true, but there is always the Federal Border Infrastructure Fund. 

I’m sure that Clement, Huntsville Mayor Claude Doughty and the manager of some local hotel could find a way to access that fund and provide Muskoka with a truly unforgettable and unsurpassed tourist attraction. 

Inasmuch as all this artwork will be surrounded by a circle of fresh pavement tourists will be able to make endless laps – round and round and round – taking their time while taking in the best political images Muskoka has to offer.

 

 

 

Personal Reflections on Casting My Ballot

I took advantage of the advance Federal poll and not having voted for Stephen Harper’s representative I left the Bracebridge Arena feeling very lucky.

Not only do I live in one of the most beautiful areas of the world I cast my vote in a democracy where the ballot still triumphs over bullets. 

In stark contrast I returned home later that day and channel-surfed to a telephone interview with a Syrian freedom fighter / demonstrator. His comments and the daily hell he lives were in stark contrast to my everyday experience and the quiet moment in which I cast my vote. 

I didn’t think to scribble notes as he talked but the courageous words he spoke, pushed forth by his obvious adrenaline rush, still resonate with me. 

He said that freedom is everything to him and after a lifetime of living under a brutal dictatorship he was willing to sacrifice his life to see an end to the repressive regime he lives under. The spilled blood of his fellow countrymen was, he said, the reason why he and others would never turn back in their quest for a free and open society. 

He spoke these words in the full knowledge that by merely speaking out he was putting his life and possibly the life of all those he was acquainted with in jeopardy. 

We in Muskoka cannot for a moment fathom this type of life and death struggle that is duplicated, not only in the Middle East and North Africa, but throughout the world. 

Although complacency is our comfort zone, we as Canadians must be every vigilant in the recognition that our democracy – our right to speak out and vote without fear – is not guaranteed. In fact, there are every day examples where our wall of democracy is being slowly dismantled, brick by brick. 

Let me expand further on that disturbingly, painful thought. 

We shudder when we see the chaos, death and destruction that come when those who want what we see as a right and not a privilege are attacked with guns, batons, mortar fire, artillery and tanks. But to a much lesser degree, what many witnessed during the Toronto G20 debacle is, on a much smaller scale, not unlike the Middle East conflicts of blatant suppression. 

In terms of individual well-being Canada ranks 22nd worst of 31 countries in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a rich group of countries. More than three million Canadians (or one in 10) are poor; and 610,000 of them are children. Nine-hundred thousand Canadians rely on food banks. Is that not a recipe for mass discontent and, consequently, a threat to our democracy? 

 In fact, Muskoka is a region where the contrast between prosperity and poverty, the ostentatious and the modest is profoundly evident. 

Pork-barrel politics erodes the very fundamentals of democracy. This upcoming Federal election will determine whether a candidate’s efforts to sway Muskoka’s voter using their own money will be successful. Win or lose, the practice is repugnant. 

Recently I wrote District Chairman John Klinck to say that I had serious concerns about the environmental destruction in Muskoka caused by aggregate mining. (Letter published in Muskoka Leaks) He has written back on two occasions and has yet to give recognition to the fact there is an environmental problem. Further, all 22 District councillors received copies of that letter. Nary has a peep been heard from even one of them. 

Let me indulge in a hypothetical scenario. If I operated a significant pit and quarry operation in Muskoka and needed some changes involving municipal compliance I would approach one or more of six area municipality mayors or the chairman of the upper tier municipal government. Is it fair to guess that approach would garner greater attention than any missive I or others could write?  So…. let’s discuss this over a good steak and fine wine. 

On a much larger scale we see that wall of democracy being torn down brick by brick by those with money and influence. Lobbying Provincial and Federal politicians has become a huge industry and virtually all major corporations have full-time “try and influence government” employees on their payrolls. The very concept of powerful lobbyists swaying our democratically elected governments flies in the face of the basic concept of one person, one vote. 

The world has reached a point where major corporations have more control and influence over “our” governments than the collective vote. Not too long ago the world economy suffered a devastating blow when American banks and insurance companies that were “too big to fail,” caused economic chaos throughout the world in the name of greed. 

In many ways we, the electorate, have brought it on ourselves. Collectively we have bought into the philosophy that growth is the only alternative to economic disaster. We must mortgage our homes, our lives and our future to perpetuate the upward spiral of growth. 

Global warming, diminishing water and food supplies, environmental destruction, wanton consumerism and greed are all products of sacrosanct growth. What alternative is being offered by those we elect?  There is no offered alternative as the tin gods of the multi-national corporations have our politicians ‘collective ear. 

This is not “pinko” prattle. Capitalism works. Competition works. Regulation is required. However, if and when the big fish have finished eating all the little fish our wall of democracy will crumble, brick by brick. 

Robert C. Henry  

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 390 other followers